The Nature of the Beast
This post marks the beginning of a different tone… I just don’t have the temperament to bother posting a few times a day. So my posts are going to be more like rants, and less frequent. It is, after all, the Internet. That means everything you see here is fact.
The way I see it, there’s a fundamental problem right at the bottom of this whole wonderful mess we call politics and government and all that.
There’s really two ways that work to run things.
We could go straight up Karl Marx, and say From each according to ability, to each according to need… not to say that complete and utter wealth redistribution is necessary with this course of action, just some sort of working towards common goals above all else. If your job happens to be obsolete, you get reassigned. If your house is in the way of the new freeway that’ll benefit a hundred thousand folks a day, enjoy your new one across town. And so forth and so on.
The alternative is straight up Adam Smith. Laissez-faire, and if you don’t like it, tough ****. Not to say this course of action endorses beating your employees or 70 hour work weeks, but hey, if GM can’t make it, then it dies. And sure, 300,000 people don’t have jobs, but society still needs cars, and society still needs skilled workers. Those who want to work for what they need will, and will get what they need and perhaps what they want because of it. Those who want to float along on the stream like nothing’s wrong, well, they’re going to drown pretty quick.
Our nature as human beings does not allow us to efficiently conduct the former system, there will always be those who attempt to exploit it. Our collective conscience does not allow us the latter system, we opt to work on 100% of the population instead of settling for 95%.
And so, we end up with a bastard lovechild of both systems, too afraid to let people fall through the cracks, and too selfish to achieve common goals. That’s the real tragedy, IMO. Both work in theory. Both will always fail in practice.